Friday, November 30, 2007

Abortion linked to drugs, alcohol abuse

Another harm associated with drug addiction:

Young women who have abortions are more likely to drink heavily and abuse hard drugs, an Australian study has found.

...

The study tracked 1,122 young women who were born at the Mater hospital in the early 1980s, finding that 21 years on, about one-third had an abortion.

Those who had an abortion were three times more likely to also abuse hard drugs, like heroin, methamphetamines and glue, than the women who had either had no pregnancy or those who had a child.

They were also twice as likely to be a binge drinker or an alcoholic, and 1.5 times more likely to suffer depression, delegates at the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) conference in Melbourne were told.

Sleepiness drug 'helps ice addicts'

Back to the future! A stimulant to treat stimulant addiction.

Next they'll be researching the effectiveness of benzos for treating alcoholism.

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Tale of Three Medics

ABC News has a story on soldiers developing drug and alcohol problems as they return to the U.S. The story will also air on 20/20 this Friday night.

Youth addictions are up, study finds

What I find shocking is not the increase, but how grossly undertreated addiction has been among young people in Detroit. 42?

The number of young Detroiters treated for substance-abuse addictions -- from alcohol to marijuana to crack cocaine and heroin -- increased sharply in the past three years, according to a public health study released Tuesday.

In 2003, 42 people ages 12 to 18 were treated. A year later, the number rose to 179. Last year it was 377.

Tuesday, November 27, 2007

New parity estimate

A new Congressional Budget Office estimate of the costs associated with Paul Wellstone Mental Health and Addiction Equity Act of 2007:
We estimate that the direct costs of the additional services that would be newly covered by insurance because of the mandate would equal about 0.4 percent of employer-sponsored health insurance premiums compared to having no mandate at all.

Irish priests fear driving bans over altar wine

Clergy, Eucharist and OUIL:
Celebrating more than one mass a day may push Roman Catholic priests over the alcohol limit if tougher drink driving rules come into effect in Ireland, a leading clergyman said on Friday.

Altar wine is an essential part of the eucharist, the ritual in which Catholics believe the priest turns bread and wine into the body and blood of Jesus Christ. A priest drinks a small amount of the wine during the mass.

Under proposed Irish legislation, the limit of 80 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood is expected to be tightened but no new level has yet been specified.

Because the ranks of the Catholic clergy are thinning out, priests -- especially in rural areas -- often drive to several churches on Sunday to say mass for congregations who have no resident clergy.

"You could be over the limit trying to travel between maybe two or three churches on a Sunday morning and coming back again," Father Brian D'Arcy told Reuters.

D'Arcy is a broadcaster and rector of the Passionist Monastery in Enniskillen, Northern Ireland, where similar changes have also been proposed.

He said wine prepared for use in services had to be consumed and throwing it away was blasphemous.

Sunday, November 25, 2007

Dr. Drug Rep

A psychiatrist writes about the influence of drug company money on his judgment and integrity.

Thursday, November 22, 2007

Relapse Among Individuals in Remission From Alcohol Dependence

From Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Background: There is little information on the stability of abstinent and nonabstinent remission from alcohol dependence in the general U.S. population. The aim of this study was to examine longitudinal changes in recovery status among individuals in remission from DSM-IV alcohol dependence, including rates and correlates of relapse, over a 3-year period.

Methods: This analysis is based on data from Waves 1 and 2 of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC), a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults aged 18 years and older originally interviewed in 2001 to 2002 and reinterviewed in 2004 to 2005. The Wave 1 NESARC identified 2,109 individuals who met the DSM-IV criteria for full remission from alcohol dependence. Of these, 1,772 were reinterviewed at Wave 2, comprising the analytic sample for this study. Recovery status at Wave 2 was examined as a function of type of remission at Wave 1, with a focus on rates of relapse, alternately defined as recurrence of any alcohol use disorder (AUD) symptoms and recurrence of DSM-IV alcohol dependence. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of relapse among asymptomatic risk drinkers and low-risk drinkers relative to abstainers, adjusted for a wide range of potential confounders.

Results: By Wave 2, 51.0% of the Wave 1 asymptomatic risk drinkers had experienced the recurrence of AUD symptoms, compared with 27.2% of low-risk drinkers and 7.3% of abstainers. Across all ages combined, the adjusted odds of recurrence of AUD symptoms relative to abstainers were 14.6 times as great for asymptomatic risk drinkers and 5.8 times as great for low-risk drinkers. The proportions of individuals who had experienced the recurrence of dependence were 10.2, 4.0, and 2.9%, respectively, and the adjusted odds ratios relative to abstainers were 7.0 for asymptomatic risk drinkers and 3.0 for low-risk drinkers. Age significantly modified the association between type of remission and relapse. Differences by type of remission were not significant for younger alcoholics, who had the highest rates of relapse.

Conclusions: Abstinence represents the most stable form of remission for most recovering alcoholics. Study findings highlight the need for better approaches to maintaining recovery among young adults in remission from alcohol dependence, who are at particularly high risk of relapse.
[via: Alcohol Reports]

European Drug Trends

Cocaine and meth appear to be hitting Europe. It will be interesting to watch the impact of these trends on their drug policies.

Wednesday, November 21, 2007

It’s not either/or, it’s both/and.

From Barack Obama:
When I’m president, we will no longer accept the false choice between being tough on crime and vigilant in our pursuit of justice. Dr. King said: “It’s not either/or, it’s both/and.” We can have a crime policy that’s both tough and smart. If you’re convicted of a crime involving drugs, of course you should be punished. But let’s not make the punishment for crack cocaine that much more severe than the punishment for powder cocaine when the real difference between the two is the skin color of the people using them. Judges think that’s wrong. Republicans think that’s wrong, Democrats think that’s wrong, and yet it’s been approved by Republican and Democratic presidents because no one has been willing to brave the politics and make it right. That will end when I am president.

Medical Marijuana

Medical marijuana will be on the ballot in Michigan.

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

Chantix concerns

The FDA has issued an Early Communication About an Ongoing Safety Review
Varenicline (marketed as Chantix)
.

I don't recall - I must have slept well

The New York Times Magazine ran a story on the sleep industrial complex. Of course, a big segment of that are medications:
...In one six-week trial, for example, people taking Ambien every night fell asleep, on average, only 23 minutes faster than those taking the placebo. They spent 88 percent of their time in bed asleep, as opposed to 82 percent. Given that their objectively measured improvements are frequently this meager, why do sleeping pills create incommensurate feelings of having slept so well?

A popular theory is that one of the pill’s side-effects is actually contributing to their success. Most sleeping pills are known to block the formation of memories during their use, creating amnesia. This is why people who endure freaky side-effects — so-called “complex sleep-related behaviors” like getting into a car and driving or ravenously eating, all while asleep — don’t remember those events. Yet this amnesia could be quite beneficial, suggests Michael Bonnet, a professor of neurology at Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine in Dayton, Ohio. “How do you know you slept last night?” Bonnet asked me. A night of lousy, interrupted sleep, he points out, is easy to remember. “It’s full of memories, noise and pain, and heat and rolling around and obtrusive thoughts and worries — all of these various stimuli.” And we may continue to register such things even while asleep, making sleep vaguely unrefreshing. But a good night of sleep, Bonnet went on to say, “is always the antithesis to all those things, which is oblivion.” A sleeping pill, Bonnet speculates, in addition to encouraging sleep chemically in the brain, also “erases all of these thoughts that we use to define ourselves as being awake. The pill knocks them all out, and the patient says, ‘Hey, I must have been asleep because I don’t remember anything.’ ”

Drug-company representatives and consultants I spoke to confirm that their pills can create this mild form of amnesia but disagree that it contributes any significant benefit. “That is not my understanding of how Ambien works,” Dario Mirski, a psychiatrist and spokesman for Ambien’s manufacturer, Sanofi-Aventis, told me. It is difficult to find a clinical trial in which Z-drug takers drastically overestimated how long they slept.

Andrew Krystal, a Duke University psychiatrist and consultant to pharmaceutical companies like Sepracor, Lunesta’s manufacturer, acknowledges an apparent discrepancy in studies between small, objectively recorded improvements and the large percentage of subjects who end up feeling that a pill alleviated their insomnia. But because insomnia is complaint-based, he explained to me, an insomniac is cured when he stops complaining.
Interestingly, studies looking at sleep disturbance in alcoholics and relapse have found that sleep disturbance is not a great predictor of relapse, but distress over sleep disturbance is a predictor. What does that suggest?

Prohibition

From a friend of a friend:
I am presently reading the book, “Paying the Tab: The Costs and Benefits of Alcohol Control,” by Philip J. Cook, Professor for Public Policy at Duke University. The book, just published by Princeton University Press, is excellent. It examines in detail the problem of alcohol consumption and abuse in the United States from the colonial era to the present. It is even handed, beautifully and clearly written, even in the presentation of knotty statistical data, meticulously researched, and heftily footnoted (25 pages of references.) It is simply the best overview of alcohol abuse I have ever read.

It punctures some myths and some favorite ideas:

EVERYONE KNOWS THAT PROHIBITION DIDN’T WORK
Prohibition was a failure in the sense that it lost popular support, but it was associated with a sharp reduction in alcohol consumption, alcoholism, incidences of domestic abuse due to alcohol, drunken driving, and especially cirrhosis of the liver (which fell by 50%). These facts are indisputably documented in the book.

DISTILLERS WOULD BE OH SO HAPPY IF EVERYONE “DRANK RESPONSIBLY.”
If that happened, they would go out of business. 80% of alcohol is consumed by 20% of the drinking population. Most alcohol is consumed by alcohol abusers. This 80/20 rule, which holds for other consumer products as well, was discovered in France, and seems to hold for alcohol consumption in all countries.

A LARGE PROPORTION OF THE AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD INCOME IS SPENT ON ALCOHOL
Alcohol sales in the US for the year 2001 amount to 128 billion dollars. That amounts to less than 2% of personal consumption expenditures that year.

EVERYONE DRINKS
We hear this from AA newcomers, and it is completely false. Over 50% of the population in the US consume so little alcohol (less than one drink per month at the most) that they may be called nondrinkers. 35% of the US population did not have even a single drink of alcohol in 2000! Again, this fact is convincingly documented.

ALCOHOL ABUSE IS MOST PREVALENT IN LOWER INCOME AND UNDEREDUCATED FAMILIES
Most alcohol is consumed by families earning $80 000 a year or more. Most is consumed by those with some college education. Black Americans consume much much less alcohol than Hispanics (50% less) who drink less than Caucasians.

GET HIM OR HER INTO THE RIGHT PROGRAM, AND THE DRINKING PROBLEM IS SOLVED
The author discusses the many different treatment modalities for alcohol abusers, and is very bullish on AA. However, for most alcohol abusers, nothing seems to work. If you are sober in AA, you should be effusive in your gratitude.

MOST ALCOHOL PROBLEMS ARE CAUSED BY ALCOHOLICS
This, strangely, does not seem to be true. To quote the author: “The reason is the ‘preventive paradox’ ---- while problems are concentrated among long-time heavy drinkers who are in enough trouble that they might be persuaded (or coerced) into seeking treatment, the bulk of alcohol related problems are diffused among the much larger group.”

GOVERNMENT EFFORTS TO CONTROL CONSUMPTION WILL INEVITABLY FAIL
The clear conclusion is that even modest government efforts to limit supply can reduce alcohol consumption. Prohibition drastically limited consumption in the lower classes (while not making a dent in the drinking habits of the affluent, who felt entitled.)

What is the author’s personal investment in this issue? Well, he holds his cards close to his vest (as he should, this being a scholarly study) but his dropping occasionally adages like, “Denial is not a river in Egypt,” will cause the cognoscenti to nod.

Monday, November 19, 2007

Settling into harm reduction

Here's an appeal for a shift toward abstinence in the U.K. It describes what's happened to recovery in a system focused on harm reduction.

via www.dailydose.net

Sunday, November 18, 2007

Treatment for internet addiction!

Jump Up Internet Rescue School

5 Armies Hopped Up on Drugs

I've read about the other four, but I don't know what to think about number five. Hash is not the drug I'd give someone I was sending off to war.

A Hidden Epidemic

The Washington Post has a great op-ed on smoking among people with mental illness:

Virtually everyone knows about the connection between smoking and health. Smoking causes 440,000 deaths a year in the United States (50,000 of which are from exposure to secondhand smoke) and 5 million worldwide. It shortens smokers' lives by 10 to 15 years, and those last few years can be a miserable combination of severe breathlessness and pain.

But few are aware that smoking is concentrated among people with mental illness, often compounded by substance-abuse disorders such as alcoholism. Go to most Alcoholics Anonymous meetings, and the room will be so full of smoke that you can cut it with a knife. Ask the members, and they will tell you that it was much easier to stop drinking than to stop smoking. Indeed, nicotine, the addictive component of tobacco smoke, is as habituating as cocaine or heroin, and it has a similar effect on chemical receptors in the brain.

The facts about smoking and mental illness are stark. Almost half of all cigarettes sold in the United States (44 percent) are consumed by people with mental illness. (emphasis added) This is because so many people who have mental illnesses smoke (50 to 80 percent, compared with less than 20 percent of the general population) and because they smoke so many cigarettes a day -- often three packs. Furthermore, smokers with mental illness are much more likely to smoke their cigarettes right down to the filters.
His comments about AA wouldn't be accurate around here. Certainly, smoking rates among AA members are very high, but I think most meetings are non-smoking. I haven't been to a smoking meeting in close to 10 years.

New York to ban smoking in treatment centers

Good for New York, but I thought New Jersey did this. If you know something I don't, tell me in comments:
For decades, addiction-treatment programs have honed in on drug and alcohol abuse and shrugged at patients' near-universal use of tobacco.

But faced with growing awareness about the power of nicotine addiction and that smoking kills more people than all other addictive drugs combined, New York officials have decided the state can no longer afford to ignore smoking.

"The entire field has struggled with the really incorrect notion that treating nicotine addiction would be really a hardship on the chemically addicted," said Karen Carpenter-Palumbo, commissioner of the state Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services.

In July, New York will become the first state in the nation to ban smoking at all its chemical dependence prevention and treatment programs, including those that treat gambling addiction.

In Florida, Addicts Find an Oasis of Sobriety

The New York Times recently printed an article about Delray Beach, Florida, and its high concentration of recovering alcoholics. They make it sound weird by seeking comments from gadfly Stanton Peele. I suppose it could be a little weird, but isn't it a nearly universal instinct to surround oneself with people with similar identities? Is the high concentration of LGBT people in Ferndale a sign of pathology?

I've never been there, but I'm pretty confident that Peele is engaging in his usual hyperbole and misrepresentation with his statement about these people "cutting [themselves] off from the outside world." Many of these people were probably cut off from the outside world in their addiction and are rejoining the rest of the world with the support of a community and environment that affirms and celebrates their recovery.